![]() |
||
| Part II: Examples of DAP Goals
The following is part two of a three-part article and is intended to describe developmentally appropriate goals and objectives for young children with disabilities which facilitate instructional inclusion in natural settings. Part I (August, 1997 issue) defined developmentally appropriate goals and objectives; Part II presents examples of DAP goals and objectives that have been effective with children in natural environments; and Part III will share some strategies for the development of DAP goals and objectives While we have much to learn about the new P.L. 105-17 (IDEA Amendments of 1997) regulations regarding IEP measurable annual goals including benchmarks or short-term objectives, we do know that developmentally appropriate goals and objectives like traditional objectives, should contain the basic components expected of all objectives. In other words, they answer the questions: Who will do what? Under what conditions? Until what criteria is met? With the added emphasis of the new law for children to remain in the "general curriculum", DAP goals and objectives useful in inclusive settings answer these questions using terms and examples that support the child within the natural environment. The child's objectives are embedded into daily routines and preferred activities, both at school and at home, and are practiced as they occur naturally. DAP objectives encourage peer interaction and the use of the targeted skill in play with peers as well as in adult / child instructional settings. The materials identified to be used in the teaching and learning sequence are interesting to the child and, therefore, are likely to increase opportunities for practicing the skill. The strategies are individualized and provide only as much support as the child needs for each particular skill rather than following a standard prompt and cue sequence. Each DAP objective is observable and measurable, linked to the child's curriculum based assessment and has individually identified, socially valid criteria, rather than standard percentages or arbitrarily determined ratios (e.g. 4 of 5 trials on 3 consecutive data days). The criteria also reflects the family's interests, the child's abilities, and the opportunities available within the setting. Being socially valid does not mean the criteria is "loosey-goosey". Instead, it reflects a reasonable and appropriate standard for each skill targeted. For example, 90% accuracy is not sufficient for success if the targeted behavior is running away...it takes only 1 error in 10 to get hit by a car. Similarly, 90% accuracy is too high an expectation for grammatical accuracy of verbal speech...just listen to yourself on tape someday and record your own errors! The following goals and objectives were designed for Desiree, age 3, and Austin, age 4, who are served in an inclusive child care setting. The goals and short term objectives (STO) reflect the children's interests, their families' priorities and are integrated into the curriculum and schedule of the center Desiree's Objectives Because of Desiree's very real and significant physical limitations, all of her objectives are hierarchical subskills and integrate motor development. To facilitate inclusion and development across all domains, family and friends, as well as preferred activities, are embedded into each objective. GOAL: Desiree will increase her attention and turn taking while playing with her friends and her brothers throughout the day.
Austin's Goals Austin's goals and objectives illustrate the importance of identifying goals that are functional in all settings. Using daily routines increases the opportunity for training by each careprovider. Providing specific examples of appropriate times to embed intervention throughout the day supports the consistency of the training. GOAL: Austin will gain attention and refer to objects (food, toys), people (mom, friends), and events (swinging, music) using gestures or sounds throughout the day at home and at child care.
*Draft regulations for P.L. 105-17 were published in the Federal Register on October 22, 1997, and can be found at a number of sites on the Internet. Among these are the Student Support Services of KSDE and the LRP - Education Administration online home page | ||
